Our website use cookies to improve and personalize your experience and to display advertisements (if any). Our website may also include cookies from third parties like Google Adsense, Google Analytics, and Youtube. By using the website, you consent to the use of cookies.

UGANDA: TotalEnergies faces 2nd lawsuit over oil projects

[tta_listen_btn listen_text=”Audio” pause_text=”Pause” resume_text=”Resume” replay_text=”Replay”]

FIVE activist groups have sued French oil major TotalEnergies for a second time over its projects in Uganda and Tanzania in a Paris civil court, they said, after an earlier fast-track attempt was dismissed in February.

The French and Ugandan groups, led by Friends of the Earth France, accuse the energy company of failing to protect people and the environment from its Tilenga oil development and the $3.5 billion East African Crude Oil Pipeline (EACOP).

Their lawsuit makes use of a 2017 French “duty of vigilance” law requiring large companies to identify risks in their global operations and supply chains, and detail strategies to prevent them.

“TotalEnergies considers that its vigilance plan is implemented effectively and has ensured that its subsidiaries in Uganda and Tanzania have applied the appropriate action plans so as to respect the rights of local communities and biodiversity,” the company said in an emailed comment.

Advertisements

“We look forward to a debate on the merits in court.”

The company holds a 62% stake in EACOP, which will run 1,443 kilometres (897 miles) from Uganda’s Lake Albert oilfields to the port of Tanga in Tanzania, with the capacity to send up to 246,000 barrels of crude per day out to world markets as early as 2025.

The first suit sought – and failed – to halt the projects by judicial order under a special fast-track process, with the judge finding that TotalEnergies’ so-called vigilance plan was legally adequate.

READ:  Two goals in six minutes earn Mali win over South Africa

The judgment added however that only a detailed investigation in a standard-speed trial could examine whether the company’s actions on the ground were in line with its duty to prevent identifiable harm.

This latest legal attempt instead seeks reparations for those who claim they have already been harmed as a result of the project construction.

Allegations run from lack of timely payment for land on which the pipeline will be built, to damaged houses from flooding during construction of oil processing facilities.

Advertisements
By AMERICA HERNANDEZ

MORE FROM THIS SECTION