Our website use cookies to improve and personalize your experience and to display advertisements (if any). Our website may also include cookies from third parties like Google Adsense, Google Analytics, and Youtube. By using the website, you consent to the use of cookies.

Ethnic cleansing by other means: UN indicts Israel over mass displacement and accelerating land seizure

THE Israeli government has pursued what the United Nations Human Rights office now describes as a concerted policy of mass forcible transfer throughout the Occupied Palestinian Territory – a finding that carries legal weight sufficient, in the UN’s own estimation, to constitute ethnic cleansing and potentially crimes against humanity.

The assessment is contained in a comprehensive report covering the twelve months to 31 October 2025, released this week in Geneva. Its release comes as conditions on the ground have continued to deteriorate sharply, with UN officials noting that the pace of land seizure and population displacement has only accelerated since the reporting period closed.

More than 36,000 Palestinians have been forcibly displaced from the occupied West Bank – coinciding with extensive military-driven displacement in Gaza – in what the UN characterises as a coordinated Israeli policy aimed at permanent demographic reconfiguration. The report’s findings place Israel squarely before the bar of international humanitarian law.

“The unlawful transfer of protected people is a war crime. Such acts potentially incur the individual criminal responsibility of officials engaged in them, and under certain circumstances may also amount to a crime against humanity.”

UN Human Rights spokesperson Thameen Al-Kheetan

SETTLER VIOLENCE AS STATE INSTRUMENT

Central to the UN’s findings is the characterisation of settler violence not as a fringe phenomenon, but as a strategic tool facilitated – and in many instances directed — by Israeli authorities. The report documents killings, physical assaults, property destruction, and the deliberate harassment of Palestinian farming communities in a manner that is described as ‘coordinated, strategic and largely unchallenged’.

The rate of lethal settler violence has surged in the opening months of 2026. Seven Palestinians have been killed by settlers across the West Bank between January and mid-March — a pace that already approaches the total of eight killed by settlers in the entirety of 2025. Israeli security forces have simultaneously continued to shoot and kill Palestinians with what the UN describes as effective impunity.

READ:  ICC to hand down judgment against former Lord's Resistance Army commander

Among the most disturbing recent incidents cited by Ajith Sunghay, head of the UN Human Rights office in the Occupied Palestinian Territory, was a weekend attack on Khirbet Humsa – one of the last Palestinian communities still standing in the northern Jordan Valley. Settlers reportedly assaulted men and women in front of their children, stole livestock, and allegedly subjected a young man to sexual assault. The violence is occurring alongside the construction of a new separation barrier designed to close the area to Palestinians entirely.

LEGISLATION AS A TOOL OF ANNEXATION

The report identifies a permissive legislative and policy environment as the infrastructure underpinning displacement. In February 2026, the Israeli cabinet adopted decisions that would further extend Israeli sovereignty over the occupied West Bank, authorise additional land seizures, and – crucially – allow settlers to purchase land from Palestinians in conditions where any such transaction cannot reasonably be considered voluntary.

In December 2025, Israeli authorities approved 19 new settlements. Of particular strategic significance was a January 2026 decision to issue tenders for thousands of settlement units in the so-called E1 area – a corridor east of Jerusalem. The UN warned that this expansion would effectively sever East Jerusalem from the rest of the West Bank, severing territorial contiguity between north and south and rendering any future Palestinian state geographically non-viable.

In the northern West Bank, Israeli security forces expelled at least 32,000 Palestinians last year. Those communities remain displaced to this day, with new settlements now being constructed on land from which they were removed.

READ:  Historic Chagos Islands agreement marks end of an era, bringing hope to displaced islanders

“Israeli senior officials’ statements point to a policy to thwart Palestinian statehood and to do maximum, irreversible damage to Palestinians’ right to self-determination.”

Ajith Sunghay, UN Human Rights

GAZA: THE CEASEFIRE THAT CHANGED LITTLE

The UN’s assessment does not spare the situation in Gaza, where five months after a ceasefire, Palestinians are described as still living under conditions of ‘precarity and dehumanisation’. The report documents 671 Palestinian deaths in Israeli military operations since the ceasefire came into effect — killings occurring both near Israeli deployment lines and far from them, in homes, on streets, and in tents.

Thousands more remain missing — buried under rubble or, in the UN’s formulation, ‘forcibly disappeared’. The flow of humanitarian aid remains unpredictable: quantities fluctuate, essential goods remain blocked, and border crossings are not reliably open. The conditions amount to what critics have long characterised as a managed humanitarian siege, maintained even after formal hostilities were suspended.

THE LEGAL RECKONING

The language deployed by UN officials is deliberate and legally precise. The invocation of ‘war crimes’, ‘crimes against humanity’, and ‘ethnic cleansing’ is not a rhetorical flourish — they are formal legal designations, each carrying implications for individual criminal responsibility and for the obligations of third-party states under international law.

The report calls on Israel to immediately cease and reverse settlement expansion, evacuate all settlers, end the occupation, enable the return of displaced Palestinians, and halt land confiscations, forced evictions, and demolitions. These demands echo resolutions of the UN Security Council and the advisory opinion of the International Court of Justice, which found Israel’s occupation to be unlawful in its entirety.

READ:  Gaza's human catastrophe: A year of documented atrocities with no end in sight

South Africa, which continues to prosecute its genocide case against Israel at the ICJ, has consistently maintained that the evidence on the ground confirms rather than refutes its legal submissions. The UN report provides further substantiation for that position.

KEY FIGURES

Displaced Palestinians (West Bank)36,000+
Palestinians killed by settlers (2025)8
Palestinians killed by settlers (Jan–Mar 2026)7 (accelerated rate)
New settlements approved (Dec 2025)19
Palestinians killed in Gaza post-ceasefire671
Palestinians expelled (northern West Bank)32,000+ (remain displaced)

ANALYSIS: WHAT THE REPORT REALLY MEANS

The pattern documented by the UN — mass displacement, legislative facilitation of land seizure, unchallenged settler violence, movement restrictions, and the deliberate obstruction of Palestinian statehood — constitutes what a growing body of international legal opinion describes as the architecture of apartheid and ethnic cleansing, pursued incrementally and with the cover of bureaucratic process.

The African Mirror notes that this report lands at a moment of deliberate international distraction. With the Iran conflict reshaping regional dynamics and Western diplomatic attention divided, the conditions exist for Israel to advance the most aggressive phase of territorial consolidation since 1967 under diminished international scrutiny.

The UN’s intervention is significant precisely because it is institutional, documented, and legally grounded. The question that remains is not whether the evidence meets the threshold for accountability — the UN itself has indicated it does — but whether the international community possesses the political will to enforce the norms it has authored.

For the African continent, which has invested diplomatic capital in the ICJ case and in solidarity with Palestinian self-determination, this report is not a matter of distant politics. It is a test of whether the post-colonial international order will extend its protections equitably, or whether Gaza and the West Bank will confirm what many in the Global South already suspect: that the rules apply only to those without great-power patronage.

By The African Mirror

MORE FROM THIS SECTION